|
Review by Sean Boelman
(L-R): Chris Pratt as Peter Quill/Star-Lord, Dave Bautista as Drax, Rocket (voiced by Bradley Cooper), Zoe Saldana as Gamora, Groot (voiced by Vin Diesel), Karen Gillan as Nebula, and Pom Klementieff as Mantis in Marvel Studios' Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3. Photo courtesy of Marvel Studios. © 2023 MARVEL.
Guardians of the Galaxy was a surprise hit, taking a relatively unknown Marvel property and turning it into one of the MCU’s most beloved. Now, nearly a decade later, we are going on our third outing with the unusual family unit. With visual and tonal shades of movies like The Fifth Element, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 is visually and thematically rich, but doesn’t quite leave the impact that fans are expecting or hoping for.
Teased as the final mission of the eponymous superhero team, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 follows the group as they set out on a quest to save one of their own. It’s surprising that — even though this is the finale of the trilogy — Gunn and co. decided to keep it rather intimate rather than having them battle a threat that holds the fate of the galaxy in its hands. Ultimately, the biggest issue with the film is that it struggles to find an effective tonal balance. Whereas the first movie — and to a lesser extent, the second — effortlessly mixed humor and heart, this finale of the trilogy attempts to take a darker tone to mixed results. Although many of the moments involving Rocket’s backstory are resonant, cutting them as flashbacks into an otherwise goofy adventure diminishes some of their impact. The real shining star of this film is Rocket Raccoon, which should come as no surprise considering that he is the focal point of the movie from a narrative and emotional standpoint. Cooper’s voice acting performance is genuinely brilliant here, bringing a level of emotion to the character that one wouldn’t expect considering how he was mostly known for wise-cracking in the other two entries.
As for the rest of the returners, Chris Pratt and Zoe Saldana really struggle here — their line delivery feeling surprisingly unnatural, Dave Bautista and Pom Klementieff are great, and Karen Gillan is doing her usual schtick. Will Poulter is added to the cast as Adam Warlock, and while he’s awesome in the role, the character feels somewhat wasted. And Chukwudi Iwuji is disproportionately great for how unevenly his role is written as the antagonist.
From a visual sense, this is likely the best Marvel has been in recent memory. The visual effects are polished and feel genuinely immersive rather than fake as many recent MCU outings have. There is also one sequence in the second act that has some of the most inventive and fun costuming and production design you will find in any film this year. And of course, the soundtrack has always been a big part of the Guardians of the Galaxy movies, and this one mostly delivers. This entry returns to some of the more populist roots of the first “Awesome Mix,” but one would be lying if they said it didn’t set the tone for a fun adventure. Sure, the needle drops are on-the-nose and a bit sentimental, but what else do you expect at this point? Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 is a fun time, and while there are some moments that are absolutely brilliant, it doesn’t cohere as well as one would hope. It’s still good, but it never manages to capture the lightning in a bottle that was the first film. Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 hits theaters on May 5. Rating: 4/5
0 Comments
Review by Adam Donato From the television director of Doctor Who and We Are Lady Parts, Nida Manzoor, comes her feature debut, Polite Society. It stars Priya Kansara as a teenage girl who aspires to be a stunt woman. Everything changes when her sister (played by Ritu Arya) starts seeing a man instead of pursuing her art career. This unlikely action comedy adds a stylized and violent twist to the typical family comedy. With a theatrical release, it will have to combat newcomers like Sisu, Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret, Big George Foreman, and a re-release of Return of the Jedi. Does Polite Society have the personality to stand out among the field? For the uninitiated, this movie takes a wild turn, and it’s all the better for it. Obviously, the main character aspires to be a stunt woman, but the extent of the high-concept action is beautifully over the top. The story was working well when it was just the hijinks of her and her friends trying to break her sister’s relationship up, but the action aspect of the storyline is what maximizes the concept. The movie has so much personality, and the fight scenes just amplify these moments. The more ridiculous the moves get, the more fun that’s to be had. It definitely delivers on the action front. Kansara and Arya are so much fun together in this movie. They feel like genuine sisters, and their bond is the life source of the movie. Nimra Bucha — who some might recognize from the Ms. Marvel show — plays the mother of the husband-to-be and is a strong antagonistic force throughout. The standouts from the supporting cast were the friends trying to help break up the couple. Seraphina Beh and Ella Bruccoleri are the funniest characters in the movie. The three friends have ample chemistry and make this venture as fun as can be. The family dynamic is well developed, especially the mother, as she has to deal with the social pressures from the lack of success from her daughters.
Polite Society is a movie that deserves to be seen in theaters. It’s more narratively competent than most of the franchise blockbuster fare cluttering the movie theater these days. Nida Manzoor has a bright future, and it will be exciting to see what she tackles next. For an original movie written and directed by a first-timer to be this enjoyable is impressive. It’s got equal parts good action, likable characters and funny moments. This is sure to be a crowd-pleaser if it garners any attention at the box office. Be sure to check this one out in theaters while it lasts. Polite Society is now playing in theaters. Rating: 4/5 Review by Joseph Fayed The Eight Mountains had its premiere at Cannes last year, where it won the Jury Prize. To some degree, I understand why it would have been awarded that honor. But for a film that deals with the passage of time, there were parts of this long-term friendship that should have been left on the cutting room floor. Pietro is a young boy who goes on holiday to the Italian Alps with his parents. While there, he meets Bruno, a boy around his age who is working on his family's farm. The two begin a friendship, but as Pietro begins school, the two fade apart. Many years later, after Pietro's father dies, he discovers he has inherited an old shack in the village. He also learns his father grew close to Bruno, who agrees to help him transform the shack. The story is divided into three acts: one recounting the protagonist's childhood, an update on their teenage/college years, and their adulthood when they reconnect. Their adulthood gets the most focus, showing what has changed for the two men over the years. One course of action the film takes is to highlight the connection to the Alps Bruno has always had, while showcasing what Pietro has made for himself in the city. While younger and older versions of the two leads are shown heavily, there is a significant gap in flashbacks showing how Bruno stayed put in the village in his teenage years. The film is slowly-paced and lets the two catch up as adults, so not spending enough time on this period in Bruno's life doesn't make sense. The last act shows how Bruno and Pietro deal with their lives going in opposite directions. One positive thing the clumsy narrative did right was set up a fitting conclusion. This is prompted by the supporting characters, who don't have much to do or say on their own, allowing the two leads to become more developed. Other than that, it seems roughly half of the film is long takes of the Italian Alps and characters climbing them.
The Eight Mountains is the story of friendship lost to time and the Alps. Much like the Italian Alps, it takes a long time to reach its peak. Its protagonists are simply not interesting enough to watch two and a half hours of. It wraps itself up well, but that is only after quite some time of going back and forth between narratives that would have worked better in different films. Maybe the jury at Cannes last year was too in awe of the impressive cinematography, I certainly was at various points while watching this. The Eight Mountains is now playing in theaters. Rating: 2/5 Review by Dan Skip Allen Disney has many iconic characters in their catalog — Cinderella, Snow White, and the Seven Dwarfs, and Pinocchio are among the top. Just below them is Peter Pan. The first Peter Pan movie came out in 1953. Ever since, many variations of this beloved Disney animated character have come out in theaters. One was a more existential version from Benh Zeitlin. Another had Hugh Jackman playing Captain Hook in Pan. Peter Pan & Wendy might be the most faithful adaptation of this beloved children's tale yet. Wendy Darling (Ever Anderson) is a big sister to her younger brothers. She plays games around the house, but when she breaks an antique, her father (Alan Tudyk) gets mad at her and threatens to send her to boarding school. While sleeping, she dreams of a character she used to tell stories about to her younger brothers: Peter Pan (Alexander Molony), who is actually a real boy. He and his faithful friend Tinker Bell (Yara Shahidi), a fairy, come to visit her and take her off to Neverland, where she meets their friends, the Lost Boys, and the villainous Captain Hook (Jude Law) who wants to rid Neverland of children. David Lowery isn't a stranger to children's films. He directed the remake of Pete's Dragon starring Robert Redford in 2016. He also has a past in the fantasy genre as he made a great film The Green Knight in 2021. Add these two films together, and you have Peter Pan & Wendy. It's a more lighthearted fantasy film without the animated dragon, and throws in instead a little pixie dust and an alligator. He understands his audience and the material he's adapting. It's one of the better live-action Disney remakes, and it perfectly fits on Disney+. With all these Peter Pan films — animated or otherwise — there are many set pieces. Sure, in live-action, you have to use strings and stages to film some of these action sequences and flying moments. They look very authentic, though. The backdrop of Ireland is a perfect fill-in for Neverland and the various locations like the woods where the Lost Boys live. The cinematography is gorgeous, wherever it is — in houses, on ships and out in the wild of woods, and on the water. This is a beautiful movie by any standards. The Peter Pan story has always been an analogy for growing up. Parents who are busy with their lives don't have time for their children, so they wish they would grow up and go out into the world. The problem with that is that kids need to have these experiences of playing, reading books, and doing fun things, so they can remember what it was like to be that age. As adults, they have those fond memories. I needed my childhood, so I could be prepared for the difficulties adulthood would bring me. This story reminds me of that, and I'm sure it will for many others, too.
Besides the cinematography, another craft that is good in the movie is its score by Daniel Hart. The score is so adventurous and boisterous. It reminded me a lot of the work of my favorite composer, John Williams. It has various arcs, some more sinister and others wide open. The action sequences and scenes flying through the skies showed the various levels and places Hart could go with the music in the film. Jude Law is an Academy Award-nominated actor. He has played many roles in his career. A villain is a rarity, though. Not many besides Yon-Rogg in Captain Marvel come to mind. One of the biggest villains in film lore is Captain Hook. It was perhaps most iconically and brilliantly played by Dustin Hoffman in the Steven Spielberg film Hook in 1991. He was very over the top as this character. Law, on the other hand, played Captain Hook more as the character in the ‘53 animated classic. He was more nuanced, but had his sinister moments. He did embrace the evil, but also tried to be more subtle and emotional in his approach to the character. Peter Pan & Wendy is the best version of this classic story based on J. M. Barrie's book since Hook for my money. The film's cinematography showed this world so beautifully. The indoor and outdoor scenes alike come to life with the camera work from Lowery and co. The cast full of mostly newcomers, the children, and established pros like Shahidi, Tudyk, and most notably Jude Law as Captain Hook are all fantastic. The thing this movie gets the most right, though, is the story, what it means, and how it never gets old. Disney has been a bit hit and miss with its live-action remakes, but this is one of the better ones. People of all ages should enjoy this version of the Disney classic tale. Peter Pan & Wendy is now streaming on Disney+. Rating: 3.5/5 Review by Camden Ferrell Citadel is the new television series from Amazon Prime coming out this spring. It is the second most expensive television show ever made, only behind the Lords of the Rings show that Amazon made as well. Already renewed for a second season ahead of its premiere, this is a high budget show that is unimaginative and sluggish thus far, wasting a rather talented cast and an unfathomable amount of money. Citadel is a global spy agency that has fallen. The agents have had their memories wiped, and a new agency is coming to power. Mason and Nadia are two agents who must remember who they are in order to take down this new threat in a worldwide adventure full of action. The premise isn’t particularly creative and feels like a standard spy thriller, but it still had potential to be riveting with the right treatment and execution. From the start, the show makes no attempt at ambition, reveling in mediocre writing and setup that doesn’t feel inspired at all. The dialogue feels overly expository and full of cheap banter that you’ve probably seen in plenty of movies in the past. The show has also failed to subvert expectations, merely following the path of least resistance. This creates a story that is more predictable than one would like. One of the few things interesting about this show is its cast. It boasts a pair of charming and visually pleasing leads in Richard Madden and Priyanka Chopra Jonas. While both are decent enough in their individual scenes, they have decent chemistry together that can help the show get past its slower and forgettable moments. Stanley Tucci and Lesley Manville play smaller supporting roles in the show, but both bring their reliable acting chops with them. It’s nothing remarkable, but it’s a silver lining in an otherwise mediocre and subpar spy thriller.
When a show of this nature lacks in its narrative, one would hope that it compensates for this with exhilarating action. There are a handful of decent set pieces in these episodes, but there isn’t anything that really justifies the price tag this show carries. The action isn’t as dynamic as you’d expect from a talented cast and crew, but it should still moderately quench viewers’ thirst for combat. When all is said and done, one can’t help but feel disappointed by Citadel. It’s a genre that is ripe for energy and subversion, but it doesn’t really deliver on either. Madden and Chopra Jonas are decent enough leads, but it can’t make up for the lack of quality material they’ve been given. It’s not a bad show by any means, but it is undeniably forgettable. It’s a show that people might forget about by the time season two rolls around. Citadel premieres its first two episodes on Prime Video on April 28 with new episodes premiering on subsequent Fridays. Three of six episodes reviewed. Rating: 2.5/5 |
Archives
September 2025
Authors
All
|

