Review by Camden Ferrell

​French Exit is the newest comedy from writer/director Azazel Jacobs, and it had its premiere at the 2020 New York Film Festival. It is based on the novel of the same name by Patrick deWitt. While it certainly has its own unique quirks, this is a movie that can often be too absurd for its own good.
 
Frances is a socialite who faces insolvency after squandering away her inheritance. She decides to take the remainder of her money and move to Paris with her son and bizarre cat. In Paris, they mull over their past while also meeting new and exciting people in their new environment. This is a simple premise with one unique twist that could have been incredibly compelling. Unfortunately, it doesn’t fully realize its potential.
 
Jacobs’ script is idiosyncratic if nothing else. It features some fairly witty dialogue that can often be overshadowed by peculiar and out of place exchanges. More than anything, the script doesn’t really flow naturally enough to achieve the surreal tone of the film, and it hinders the movies ability to transcend into profound and eccentric territory.
 
The one main highlight of the film is the undeniably passionate leading performance from Michelle Pfeiffer. She is a powerhouse of an actress who does a fair amount with her role despite how limiting it initially seems. Her delivery is convincing, and her timing and chemistry is great. Unfortunately, she isn’t always provided the resources by this movie to truly be amazing. The film co-stars Lucas Hedges as her son. While he is fairly decent alongside Pfeiffer, his performance doesn’t really amount to anything memorable. 

The movie is nearly two hours long, and it never really feels like it earns that run time. The pacing can be so sluggish at times, and it truly feels that this movie could have been better if it had been under ninety minutes. There is a consistent inconsistency in how the scenes transition and flow. The odd pacing is one of the main things hindering the film’s enjoyability.
 
While Jacobs is known for his offbeat and eccentric humor, this is a movie that has a hard time locating any of that same charm. It feels like an overt attempt to be witty and zany, but it comes off as superficial and fairly uninteresting throughout. Not to say it’s a bad film, but a lot of the humor and quirks do not land like they were intended to.
 
This is a movie that well-made in its cinematography, blocking, and production design. Unfortunately, the stylistic choices of the film are undermined by its lack of substance. Its themes are muddled in the messiness of its script, and it’s a film that is more forgettable than objectionably bad.
 
French Exit may appeal to those who heavily identify with Jacobs’ brand of comedy, but it won’t do much for the average viewer. It features a great leading performance while everything else falls pretty flat.
 
French Exit is in theaters February 12.
 
Rating: 2.5/5

Review by Sean Boelman

Slow-burn indie horror has become quite the phenomenon in recent years, and it is always exciting to see what young filmmakers are able to do with the genre despite their limited resources. Jordan Graham’s Sator certainly shows some interesting craft, and even if the script could have used a bit of tightening, the atmosphere is strong enough to make it worth watching.

The movie follows a family living a secluded lifestyle that finds themselves tested when they begin to realize that there is a possibly malevolent supernatural force guiding their lives. And even though the film’s rustic setting does come into play, this isn’t a typical woods-bound horror flick, instead opting for something more psychological.

Undoubtedly the strongest aspect of the movie is its atmosphere, largely defined by some of the eerie imagery used in the film. Although a majority of the strongest moments come in the final third, there is just enough creepiness in the first hour to keep the viewer invested in the mystery of what is going on.

Graham is obviously trying to do something ambitious here, with the inclusion of home video footage to create different timelines being one of the most interesting choices, but it doesn’t always pay off. It tries to straddle the line between abstract and scary but can’t strike the right balance between the two.

At times, it does feel as if the narrative is beginning to meander. Rather than trying to tell his story in a straightforward way, Graham creates a complex web of family history. However, the world-building here is not strong enough to support such an expansive narrative and as such, the low budget begins to show itself.

The character development in the movie is also significantly lacking. Although the things that the film has to say about family are interesting, the characters come across as extremely distant. And while there is a purpose to this, it also prevents the audience from forming any sort of emotional connection to the story.

The cast of the movie does a good enough job in their roles, but it’s nothing particularly spectacular. The fact that none of the actors are big names keeps the intimate tone of the film up, but they also don’t quite have the confidence to really drive the movie, especially since so much of the film is dependent on subtle mannerisms.

Sator is an interesting genre picture, but it’s not as consistent as one would like. A few great moments and effective execution allow this to be entertaining even if it doesn’t meet its ambitious goals.

Sator is now available on VOD.

Rating: 3/5

Review by Dan Skip Allen

The look of the film is not good either. It's set in the aftermath of WWII, but it is filmed inside supposed prison cells and rooms such as offices and houses. These could be anywhere or on a soundstage for all I know. There was no distinction on the location of these places even though the film takes place in Denmark. This film could take place anywhere. The filmmaking style doesn't make sense from this point of view.

I am a fan of a good WWII-set film, but this film is bad all-around, from the delivery of this nonsensical dialogue to the filmmaking style of the film. This movie is just not put together very well at all. Maybe it didn't have a big budget and that affected the overall production. Who knows? The biggest clue about this film though is the fact that it didn't come out for three years after it premiered. That's always a red flag on the quality of a film.

​Murderous Trance is now available on VOD.

Rating: 1/5

Review by Camden Ferrell

Music is singer/songwriter Sia’s first endeavor in the world of film. She both directed and co-wrote this musically centric film. Unfortunately, this film is an offensive exploitation of the autistic community that is ill-informed and poorly executed.
 
Zu, is a recovering addict who deals drugs when she is suddenly entrusted with caring for her half-sister after the death of her grandma. Her half-sister is an autistic teenager named Music, and Zu must grow as a person to take care of not only her sister but herself. This is a premise that isn’t terrible in theory, but the results are abysmal in practice.
 
The script, co-written by Sia and Dallas Clayton, is a tonal mess from the start. It lacks any compelling dialogue, and many of its lines come off as inconsistent and inconsequential. The movie doesn’t develop a lot of its characters nearly enough, and its themes are incredibly contrived and half-baked. Sia’s direction also seems to be inconsistent, and it truly makes this film drag on much longer than its story warrants.
 
What the movie truly lacks is an understanding of autism and the proper away to tactfully approach the subject. It’s not subtle in the way it dehumanizes its titular character and how it treats her as a nuisance rather than a person. One could argue this is for the sake of Zu’s development as a character, but there is nothing redeeming in her character to justify how it treats its autistic character.

The acting in this movie is just as messy as the other aspects of the film. Kate Hudson leads the film as Zu. Her acting is bland more often than not, and she isn’t particularly compelling or interesting in any of her scenes. However, Maddie Ziegler delivers one of the most demeaning performances in recent memory as Music. She reduces the character down to some terribly offensive facial expressions and misguided actions that makes you wonder how this was deemed acceptable on set. Leslie Odom Jr. co-stars as Ebo, their neighbor who helps take care of Music. While his performance is the least objectionable of the cast, it is still inconsistent and dull.
 
The movie features more than one scene of the physical restraint of Music during an episode that is potentially dangerous. It seems this lack of knowledge about the autistic community is present throughout the entire film in smaller quantities. The movie has no interest in exploring the nature of autism. It merely reduces the character to a gimmick to earn cheap sympathy points. It demeans the autistic community and does nothing to advocate or educate.
 
For a film that is musically centered, there is also a surprising lack of music. The music numbers are more spaced out than one would assume. This wouldn’t be a problem if the interweaving narrative between musical numbers was interesting, but that’s unfortunately not the case with this film. The songs themselves are fairly decent throughout, and this is possibly the film’s sole redeeming characteristic. However, it seems that Sia is concerned with being quirky for the sake of being quirky. Her musical numbers are not the profound metaphor for autism that she seems to believe it is. There is a lot of campy style, but no substance to any of the film’s musical numbers.
 
Music is a fever dream in all the worst ways. It is a harmful story that perpetuates a lot of negative stigma facing the autistic community. The movie was made without regard for people with autism, and it merely exploits their condition rather than understanding it and empathetically portraying it. This is a movie that is not worth seeing, even for fans of Sia’s previous work.
 
Music is playing in IMAX theaters February 10 and on VOD February 12.
 
Rating: 1/5

Review by Dan Skip Allen

Fish out of water stories can be hit and miss. They capture the magic of a person, animal, or family in a place that is not familiar to them. A lot of writers and directors have tackled this genre of film, but Minari shows a perspective that has rarely been shown before. It's rare to see a film that does something different while also in a subgenre fan have seen before.
​
The Yi family — Jacob, Monica, and their two kids David and Anne — move from Korea to a small town in rural Arkansas to become farmers. They are over their heads from the very beginning of the film. They start as chicken sexters and end up trying to make things work as farmers. It's not as easy as they think.

Set in the 1980s, Minari has a great aesthetic of that period. From the clothes and cars, the film is very authentic to the time. Lee Isaac Chung wrote this film basically about his upbringing so it's semi-autobiographical. He includes a lot of things such as peeing in the bed and having the water turned off because they were using too much to water the crops.

The struggles this family is going through are relatable for quite a few people around the world, let alone Americans. Not everyone can be described as farmers, but people have struggled with their finances everywhere. Raising kids can be quite hard at times as well. Chung comes from a place people can get behind. I for one can relate to all the struggles that are depicted in the film.

One of the aspects of this story is the foreign language this family speaks. Subtitles are used to supplement the dialogue of the film so that it goes back and forth between both English and Korean seamlessly. This helped show the fish out of water aspect as well. It's not everyday Koreans move into a small Arkansas town to become farmers.